'Knowing Whether' in Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
Proper epistemic knowledge bases (PEKBs) are syntactic knowledge bases that use multi-agent epistemic logic to represent nested multi-agent knowledge and belief. PEKBs have certain syntactic restrictions that lead to desirable computational properties; primarily, a PEKB is a conjunction of modal literals, and therefore contains no disjunction. Sound entailment can be checked in polynomial time, and is complete for a large set of arbitrary formulae in logics Kn and KDn. In this paper, we extend PEKBs to deal with a restricted form of disjunction: ‘knowing whether’. An agent i knows whether φ iff agent i knows φ or knows ¬φ; that is, iφ ∨ i¬φ. In our experience, the ability to represent that an agent knows whether something holds is useful in many multi-agent domains. We represent knowing whether with a modal operator, ∆i, and present sound polynomial-time entailment algorithms on PEKBs with ∆i in Kn and KDn, but which are complete for a smaller class of queries than standard PEKBs.
منابع مشابه
Efficient Reasoning in Multiagent Knowledge Bases
In many applications, agents must reason about what other agents know, whether to coordinate with them or to come out on top in a competitive situation. However in general, reasoning in a multiagent epistemic logic such as Kn has high complexity. In this paper, we look at a restricted class of knowledge bases that are sets of modal literals. We call these proper epistemic knowledge bases (PEKBs...
متن کاملBeyond knowing that: a new generation of epistemic logics
Epistemic logic has become a major field of philosophical logic ever since the groundbreaking work by Hintikka (1962). Despite its various successful applications in theoretical computer science, AI, and game theory, the technical development of the field has been mainly focusing on the propositional part, i.e., the propositional modal logics of “knowing that”. However, knowledge is expressed i...
متن کاملProper Epistemic Knowledge Bases
Reasoning about the nested beliefs or knowledge of other agents is essential for many collaborative and competitive tasks. However, reasoning with nested belief (for example through epistemic logics) is computationally expensive. Proper Epistemic Knowledge Bases (PEKBs) address this by enforcing syntactic restrictions on the knowledge base. By compiling a PEKB and query formula into a specific ...
متن کاملAxiomatization and complexity of modal logic with knowing-what operator on model class K
Standard epistemic logic studies propositional knowledge, yet many other types of knowledge such as “knowing whether”, “knowing what”, “knowing how” are frequently and widely used in everyday life as well as academic fields. In [11], an axiomatization of the epistemic logic with both regular “knowing that” operator and “conditionally knowing what” operator is given. Then the decidability and co...
متن کاملEfficient Reasoning in Multiagent Epistemic Logics
In many applications, agents must reason about what other agents know, whether to coordinate with them or to come out on top in a competitive situation. However in general, reasoning in a multiagent epistemic logic such as Kn has high complexity. In this paper, we look at a restricted class of knowledge bases that are sets of modal literals. We call these proper epistemic knowledge bases (PEKBs...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016